This week’s tweet deals with the question: Who are you talking to?
Mr. bouvierm tells us:
Who is Sarah? Well, that’s easy. Sarah is obviously bouvierm’s actual girl-friend. That’s not that much of a surprise because Sarah is bouvierm’s only contact in twitter. We really hope this does not apply to his offline life. Take just a second with us to have a look into this boy’s little cosmos.
Sadly enough Sarah gives updates only to friends. Luckily enough you can read anything she writes in twitter search. Well, it seems to be a happy couple so we don’t want to rush into the their relationship too much.
It’s interesting enough that bouvierm tells twitter that there is going to happen a sexual thing between him and Sarah tonight. Why does he do that? It might be that he doesn’t know anyone can read his tweets and not only his only follower. Well, as you saw, even if you lock your updates they’re not really locked.
But insofar it could be part of a game or something. You know these “hide and seek in the internet, although we’re a couple in reality” games, don’t ya ? Besides, there’s no real advantage in getting an SMS from twitter instead getting it from your mobile, is there? You see, many questions arise from this information although there’s no need for us to know more about it.
So, here’s a little bit critical thinking: Are we some kind of rude in having a look into that private sphere? Well, that really could be, but anyhow bouvierm doesn’t seem to act that much on decency himself…
… and is so busy we don’t think he cares that much:
Maybe he’s that sort of an infantile chauvinist, which we generally call “male” or just stupid 😉
Ok, I’m jealous… no video games for me last night…
Seriously people, this is a joke between my girlfriend Sarah and I. We do indeed have a rough life of sex, video games, and movies, but those messages are supposed to be just for us. I am not a chauvinist…although I love punishing her with spankings and orgasm after orgasm.
“We do indeed have a rough life of sex”
-> congratulations 😉
“but those messages are supposed to be just for us” -> failed 🙂