The tweet of this week is the fol­lo­wing:

This one real­ly made me laugh. In eng­lish it’s “Swal­low. Get­ting feed­back in a minu­te.” Well, may­be it’s just me having too much sexu­al moti­va­ted thoughts due to rea­ding too much hor­ri­ble stuff on twit­ter.

The real sto­ry must be some­thing like Fräu­lein Schnu­te is sho­cked, becau­se she gets feed­back soon to some­thing she does­n’t tell us. May­be some­thing con­nec­ted to her job. But how can we pos­si­bly get just that one pic­tu­re, just that one sto­ry?

There’s a dif­fe­rent sto­ry within this tweet that came up in my mind first. I don’t wan­na paint the who­le pic­tu­re to you. I’m sure you can do that on your own and in more fasci­na­ting colours than any­thing I could wri­te by now.

This com­bi­ned with the infor­ma­ti­on someone bee­ing the more acti­ve part within this sto­ry should get a *feed­back* in a minu­te — real­ly sho­cked me.

Link: Have a look at Fräu­lein Schnute’s beau­tiful web­site to find out more about her.

This week’s tweet deals with the ques­ti­on: Who are you tal­king to?
Mr. bou­vierm tells us:

Who is Sarah? Well, that’s easy. Sarah is obvious­ly bou­vierm’s actu­al girl-fri­end. That’s not that much of a sur­pri­se becau­se Sarah is bou­vierm’s only cont­act in twit­ter. We real­ly hope this does not app­ly to his off­line life. Take just a second with us to have a look into this boy’s litt­le cos­mos.

Sad­ly enough Sarah gives updates only to fri­ends. Lucki­ly enough you can read any­thing she wri­tes in twit­ter search. Well, it seems to be a hap­py cou­ple so we don’t want to rush into the their rela­ti­onship too much.

It’s inte­res­t­ing enough that bou­vierm tells twit­ter that the­re is going to hap­pen a sexu­al thing bet­ween him and Sarah tonight. Why does he do that? It might be that he does­n’t know anyo­ne can read his tweets and not only his only fol­lower. Well, as you saw, even if you lock your updates they’­re not real­ly locked.

But inso­far it could be part of a game or some­thing. You know the­se “hide and seek in the inter­net, alt­hough we’­re a cou­ple in rea­li­ty” games, don’t ya ? Bes­i­des, there’s no real advan­ta­ge in get­ting an SMS from twit­ter ins­tead get­ting it from your mobi­le, is the­re? You see, many ques­ti­ons ari­se from this infor­ma­ti­on alt­hough there’s no need for us to know more about it.

So, here’s a litt­le bit cri­ti­cal thin­king: Are we some kind of rude in having a look into that pri­va­te sphe­re? Well, that real­ly could be, but anyhow bou­vierm does­n’t seem to act that much on decen­cy hims­elf…

… and is so busy we don’t think he cares that much: